Science under the Swastika, Wolfgang Goede


Latest research reveals: It’s a myth that the Nazis applied force to subdue German scientists and science journalists. Not only did they for the most part voluntarily follow  the party line, they even surpassed party officials. More than 60 years after the end of WW II historians are producing new and shocking evidence  that the influence of the Third Reich was deeply ingrained in the German population. Indeed,  Germans enjoyed more liberties than previously assumed! Why did the scientific community and journalists support Hitler’s ideology, the war and the holocaust? And how does this impact science and science journalism today? The article is based on a presentation given  at the Euroscience Open Forum (ESOF) 2008 Barcelona on the panel of the European Union Science Journalists’ Associations (EUSJA) on „Ethics in Science Journalism“ in July 2008.



This article is composed of three parts. The first part deals with the role of German science journalists during the Nazi regime and offers new information stemming from a recently finished study.The second part enlarges the focus and investigates the participation of technicians and scientists: medical doctors, physicists, engineers. This is based on research carried out by the principal German scientific organizations during the last decade.  Finally, I try to find answers to the question why so many science journalists and scientists voluntarily went along with the terror system and contributed to it. As it turns out the Nazis applied rather simple psychological tools which human beings, especially scientists are very susceptible to.


The TELI investigation of its journalistic history

The German Association of Science Writers (TELI), founded in 1929 in Berlin, is the oldest of its kind and is the first journalistic organization which has tried to come to grips with its past. The historian Hans Christian Foerster has dug into the Association’s archive, researched its development from the period of its founding until 1945 and has documented astounding contradictions in his recent publication „In the Beginning was the TELI. Journalists for Science and Technique 1929 – 1945“ („Am Anfang war die TELI, Journalismus für Wissenschaft und Technik 1929 bis 1945“).[1]

TELI’s founders were leading journalists in Berlin  who shared a surprisingly farsighted and modern vision, even by contemporary standards. They wanted to enlighten their readership, help them to recognize mistakes in advance, foster critical judgement and encourage a dialogue between experts and the public as well as influence the opinions of politicians and promote public participation in the Weimar Republic (1919 – 1933). TELI’s first president, Siegfried Hartmann, had become Germany’s first technical writer in 1919. He advocated strictly separating the editorial and  advertising departments. Co-founder Kurt Joel was one of the finest experts on science, a liberal and a democrat who defended Albert Einstein from anti-Semitic attacks.

In 1933, the Nazi party came into power. Almost immediately, journalists were obliged to work under the auspices of Joseph Goebbel’s Propaganda Ministry. „You will receive not only information, but also instructions“, he announced on March 15, 1933. Six weeks later, the National Journalists’ Association elected a Nazi as its new president. Six months later, a new law was passed which decreed that every journalist prove his Aryan descent. Jews were automatically forced to resign from their positions.

How did that affect the TELI? While the Jewish members were leaving the organization (some went into exile, some died in the concentration camps), Hartmann steered clear of Nazi politics and refrained from using Nazi jargon like „German technique“ or „the new state“. However, when he died in 1935 the journalists’ organization toed the line increasingly;  resistance vanished. The organization split into three factions: the „non-political“ members who believed that research and technology should not be associated with politics; the enthusiasts who were impressed by the Nazis’ commitment to science and technology and finally the opportunists who were hoping for personal advantage in the form of rewarding careers.


„Engineers are at the front, every German is a soldier“

A few examples of what happened to some members: While Dr. Dr. Hans Baumann, press officer of the German Railroad, left in 1933 and somehow managed as a Jew to survive the Nazi terror in Berlin, Eduard Rhein became one of the most prominent technical journalists of the Third Reich. He wrote for the „Signal“, a magazine which which had a wide circulation in the occupied countries. Surprisingly, co-founder Willy Moebus – although a social democrat – continued to make a living as a journalist despite the fact that he was under surveillance by the Nazis. Naturally his articles were written very carefully. In 1939, six months before the war, he published a piece with the title „Politics shapes Technology“ in which he states: „Engineers are at the front, every German is a soldier.“[2] Hans Dominik was the author of best-selling science fiction books which earned him the reputation as a „German Jules Verne“. He was a conservative, despised the Nazis although he supported them, even  making Goebbels an offer to revise his own books and give them a national socialist slant. The paper shortage foiled Dominik’s ambitions.

Slowly but surely the TELI sold out. In1938 the organization accepted the appointment of two loyal Nazis to the board of directors as controllers. That loss of independence could have been stopped as other scientific organizations managed      to do. One year later, on the occasion of its 10th anniversary, the TELI was warmly embraced by party officals who lured the organization to particpate in a so-called „techno-political education“ seminar which taught propaganda methods. Thereafter, many Nazis, SS- and SA members joined TELI’s ranks.


More than 50 percent of the TELI members spread Nazism

In 1939, once the war began, „the members lost their integrity completely“ according to Foerster.[3]  Many long-standing members actively promoted and glorified the regime: in their assignments as reporters, as public relation officers in key ministries such as war and armament and communication as well as their involvement in companies which produced weapons and materials relevant to the military. More than 50 percent out of  110 TELI members were not only supporters of the Nazi ideology,  they actively participated in spreading Nazism and, according to Foerster, „became guilty“. After the war 38 publications by 18 TELI members were confiscated for  their blatant national socialistic contents.

In concrete figures: Between 1938 and 1943 the TELI had 110 registered members, 57 journalists and 53 associated members with technical and scientific professions as well as communication and public relation experts. More than half of the journalists and two thirds of the associated membership were enrolled in the Nazi party. The Nazi movement came in three waves: 1933 after Hitler had come into power, 1936 during the Olympic games in Berlin, 1940 when Hitler had conquered France and started to occupy vast parts of Europe.[4]

The hope of many members to survive in an „unpolitical niche“ turned out to be an illusion because a striving for excellency in technology was embedded in Nazi politics as a basic element. Nonetheless, after 1945 TELI members created the myth that they had stayed unpolitical or were forced to aid the regime. Suddenly everybody considered himself a victim. Many  other journalists and publishers, in fact the entire country used this excuse and it became  legendary. The Bertelsmann publishing company which profited during the war from anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi literature such as „Landser-Hefte“ (moral and emotional ammunition for soldiers at the front ) could successfully defend until 1998 its role as a victim.[5] The Rowohlt Publishing Company, famous for its paperbacks and a pronounced liberal and critical course during the postwar period, has only recently admitted that its chief executive participated in propaganda campaigns against Jews in the Arabic world.[6] Journalists have rarely bothered to take a direct look at their own role in the Third Reich.

Many who were committed to the Nazi regime became leaders of public opinion during the 1950s and 60s – and no one ever dared to contest their claims. Even Henri Nannen, founder of the „stern“ which reached a circulation of several million copies in its heyday, mimed Nazi language as a young journalist.[7]

Scientists, of course, engaged in this collective cover-up as well. During  the last decade, however, major German research organizations have begun to look into their own histories. Here are some of the results:


Masterplan East: an agronomist wanted to create another holocaust

Last year an exhibition in Germany shed light on the forgotten „Masterplan East“.[8]  Agronomists had drafted a scheme to colonize Eastern Europe with the aim of deporting 30 million people. Germans were to settle this region while the local population was to be taken to concentration camps or killed.The scientists developed the plans entirely on their own without any pressure from functionaries. On maps which planned out the details, an Autobahn can be seen leading from Berlin to Moscow, another one goes as far as the Black Sea. The prestigious “German Research Society” DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) financed this project with 500 000 Reichsmark – 10 percent of its budget. The initiator of the Masterplan East was professor Konrad Meyer. About a dozen different scientific disciplines such as geology, climatology and urban planning were involved in the initial planning stage. After the war, Meyer was acquitted of his crime, claiming that he had received orders and consequently was able to continue his career. In a seperate study, just recently initiated, the DFG admits that as of 1933 it „wholeheartedly supported the NS regime“, that it participated in banning Jewish and democratic scientists from academic life. Moreover, the organization feels guilty for having sponsored „criminal research“ and financed sterilization experiments at the Auschwitz concentration camp as well as Josef Mengele’s research on twins.


How the physicists tried to resist the regime

The German Physicists Society (DPG) is one of the oldest and most renowned research organizations in the country. Its most prominent member was Albert Einstein who was DPG president from 1916 to 1918; in 1933 he resigned from the organisation and emigrated after 20 years of activity in political life to the USA. Note:  science and politics are not mutually exclusive!  German physicists were fond of claiming their resistance to the Nazi party and the concept of „Germanized physics“ which disqualified Einstein’s theory of relativity as a Jewish conspiracy. This claim  can only be partially validated, cautions a newly published book with the title „Physicists between autonomy and opportunity“.[9] Although it is true that the association managed for many years to keep its distance from the regime, when  political pressure increased, by 1938 all Jewish members were asked to resign. By  contrast,  the TELI had already caved in in 1933. Until 1944 the DPG physists had ignored a request to place a Nazi member as controller (and spy) on their board  of  directors. Only three months before the end of the war, in January 1945, president Carl Ramsauer admitted  at the 100th anniversary of the DPG: that „physics has become a major military factor which is decisive for war and peace“ and that  German physicists were going to compete more eagerly with the anglo-saxon countries and in  the development of new weapons. 18 months later, the US dropped  the first atomic bomb on Japan.

Would the Germans have won the A-bomb race if  physicists had collaborated with the regime from the beginning? And how would that have changed the war?


The physicians’ guilt

While  physicists tried to resist, sometimes successfully, physicians did not even make the attempt, despite  their oath. They engaged in the most awful medical tests on humans. For example, placing prisoners in ice water in order to observe the moment of death or implanting slivers of wood and glass into bodies to study the development of  infection – all this, of course, with the purpose of „enhancing medicine“. The Robert-Koch-Institute infected people with typhus and plague in the pursuit of suitable vaccines.

As a result, 250 000 innocent people were murdered, among them 80 000 handicapped  who were euthanized. 20 medical doctors and 3 NS functionaries stood trial in Nuremberg in 1946. 8 were sentenced to death, 7 received a life sentence –  most  were released by 1954. Professor Hubertus Strughold, highest ranking doctor in the German Air Force, was not tried but taken to the USA with his research where he became the father of space medicine. Why did hundreds, perhaps thousands of physicians kill people? Although incromprehensible to us, scientific curiosity must have been one of their motivations. Still, the majority shared the ideological and racist belief in eugenics and euthanasia which some Germans considered necessary for survival in a hostile environment. The topic remains controversial: In the spring of 2008, German doctors rewarded 92 year old Hans-Joachim Sewering for his merits as one of Germany’s leading physician. He had been a member of the SS and had allegedly contributed to the euthanasia program.[10],[11]

The German Red Cross turned into a „Brown Cross“ according to a new study, released just last month. For example, an international Red Cross delegation which visited the concentration camp Theresienstadt was misled by its German colleagues. An articial environment was prepared for the visitors in order to cover the misery and horror. The physician Ernst-Robert Grawitz, one of the key people behind euthanasia and human experiments in the concentration camps, became the president of the German Red Cross.[12]


The Japanese Unit 731 in Machuko

Of course, medical doctors perverted and killed people for scientific and ideological reasons, not only in Nazi Germany. Hitler’s far eastern allies, the Japanese, were just as committed to medical murder as the Germans, as my Russian colleague Alexander Choma has found. He did research on  Unit 731 which Japanese doctors established during WW II in Manchukuo. The subjects of their investigation were branded „Maruta“, i.e., „log“. To gain more knowledge on human bodies and their tolerance the Japanese doctors subjected prisoners to vivisection without anesthesia. They amputed arms and legs to study blood loss, limbs were frozen and then thawed to study the effects of decay, human targets were used to test the effect of grenades positioned at various distances, people were hung by their feet to see how long the death process would take, others were placed into high- and low-pressure chambers or exposed to very low or very high temperatures, put into centrifuges and spun to death, exposed to lethal doses of x-ray radiation. More than 10 000 people died, most of them Chinese and Russians.[13]

At the end of the war, General MacArthur granted immunity to the physicians of Unit 731 in exchange for providing his country with their research, including data on biological warfare. This information came in handy according to some sources during the Vietnam war. The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal heard only one reference to Japanese experiments with „poisonous serums“ on Chinese civilians. It was dismissed by the tribunal president, Sir William Webb for lack of evidence. Only the Soviet Union prosecuted perpetrators of such atrocities and sent some Japanese doctors for up to 25 years in a Siberian labor camp. The majority was not held responsible. Former members of Unit 731 became part of the Japanese medical establishment. One led Japan’s largest pharmaceutical company. Shiro Ishii, the commander of the unit, moved to the US to work on bio-weapons reasearch. Japanese school children will look in vain for information about Unit 731 in their history books. It took until 2002 for a Tokyo court to admit its existence. In 2005, it ruled that the victims and their families weren’t eligible for any compensation.

During the war there was no opposition to  the horrendous practices of the Unit. Supposedly Japan’s prime minister and even the emperor knew about it and approved of it. Euthanasia in Germany was not contested either, except by Lothar Kreyssig. He was a judge and a member of a Protestant movement („Bekennende Kirche“), which opposed Hitler. In 1940, he realized that handicapped people were being killed. He addressed a letter to the chief justice and learned that Hitler himself had ordered these measures. Kreyssig filed charges and intervened in the institutions for the disabled: „Nobody shall be handed over to the authorities without my permission.“ The conflict escalated, Hitler’s office showed him the euthanasia order, but the judge calmly responded: „The Führer’s order is not equivilent to a law.“ It took 16 months until Hitler decided to punish his adversary, very mildly though. Kreyssig was fired and went into early retirement.[14] In 1958, he founded „Action Reconciliation“ which sends young volunteers to countries which suffered under German occupation. It has just celebrated its 50th anniversary.


The Quandts and Krupps, Reichsbahn and VW

Germans, especially journalists and historians, have been very active in uncovering  war crimes – especially during the past ten years. Only recently did the Quandt family, which owns 46,6 percent of the automobile manufacturer BMW, respond to media pressure and nominate a historical commission to investigate its own history. Günther Quandt, proganda minister Goebbel’s stepson, had set up a booming empire in industrial plants during the Nazi regime. It produced, among other things, batteries for submarines. A new publication claims that the Krupp concern, major producer of armaments during the war, employed 60 000 slave workers, many more than had previously been assumed. At the end of last year, a TV production raised the question whether the Berlin philharmonic orchestra was a Nazi orchestra because of its role as amplifier for Nazi propaganda. [15],[16],[17]

Last but not least, the German Railroad has documented its own role in mobilizing the holocaust. Currenty, the exhibition „Special Trains to Death“, displayed at train stations in cities throughout Germany, explores how the „Reichsbahn“ deported millions of Jews to the concentration camps.[18],[19]

Not only do Germans of a past generation live with the burden of Nazism, all Germans are effected. The syndicate of  chimney sweepers, which provided ample jobs to Nazi party members, still has a monopoly in the country; the reflectors on bicycle pedals were invented by Nazis and were made mandatory, thus producing a tidy profit for the party. And, of course, the „people’s car“, the  Volkswagen, was invented and named, exactly 70 years ago, by Mr. Hitler himself. The original logo, designed by the Nazis, is still used. We should consider it a warning about the abuse of technology.[20],[21]


„Engineers, the best allies of dictators“

Technology was the backbone of the regime which attracted TELI journalists and engineers alike. Still, not everyone realized back then that radio and television (which by the way was inaugurated in 1936 for the Olymics), as well as cars and autobahns  were to become the basis for propaganda, a means of gaining the sympathy of the general population and, lastly, leading to militarization and war. For example: The engineer Wernher von Braun had a dream. He wanted to build the first rocket. He developed the “Wunderwaffe” V2, a marvel of science, which in 1944 destroyed large segments of London. Later he felt sorry for the death of some 5000 people and apologized stubbornly: “But I wanted to fly to the moon,” he insisted. Let us also not forget that many thousand of prisoners died during the development phase of von Braun’s project.

After the war, V2 constructor Wernher von Braun was brought to the United States. There he  continued his research on rockets and  became the mastermind of the Apollo program, the flight to the moon and space flight in general. In September 2007 a German newspaper reviewed US-historian Michael Neufeld’s new book „Von Braun. Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War“. [22] The title of his review was causticly  well-articulated: „Doctor Faustus, redeemed by Sputnik“.[23] The escalating cold war and the Russian competition in space finally made von Braun’s dream come true. He would have worked for anyone to get his rockets to the moon. Only for that reason did he become a member of the SS, although he rarely wore a uniform. A debate held in Munich during the year of the humanities in 2007 focused on the ethics of engineers. One participant said: „Engineers constitute a moral vacuum and are the best allies of dictators.“[24]

German fascism offered tremendous opportunities for many people: careers and unlimited research. There were no legal strings attached, free labour and the most generous funding if  projects met the murderous goals of Nazi ideology. Numerous  smart and ambitious people knew how to take advantage of this unique situation. It was like being in paradise, some probably felt a little like God.


The humanization of murder

And yet, there are still other clues to solve the mystery of the attraction of murderous ideologies. For the past  61 years, the weekly magazine „Spiegel“ has been trying  to discover why so many Germans fell for the Nazi ideology. In the March 10, 2008 edition of the magazine there was an article with the title: „The deliquents. Why so many Germans became murderers“.[25] Approximately 200 000 Germans participated in killing six million Jews, but they were „neither sadists, nor  psychopaths just normal men“. No case has been documented to prove that anyone was forced to kill. If someone did not want to participate he was free to leave without suffering personal consequences. Some commanders were literary driven to tears when receiving orders to execute people, and justified their acts by desperately muttering: „An order is an order.“ The bloodshed was so stressful that even SS boss, Heinrich Himmler,  once almost fainted when he witnessed an execution. To help overcome these practical difficulties,  gas chambers were invented and welcomed, without any cynicism, as a means of „humanizing murder“.

Gas chambers industrialized death, made the holocaust anonymous, and diffused responsibilities. Most importantly, as the psychologist Harald Welzer [26] points out, the Nazis were able to move the „normative reference frame“ by turning Jews into outlaws and labeling them lesser beings or even sub-humans – in contrast of course to the German master race. Japanese technicians of murder applied the same formula calling Chinese and Russians „Maruta“ – dead wood. The German defeat at the conclusion of  WW I, the economic depression were instrumentalized as machinations of  the Jews. They were the scapegoats and no one needed to feel guilty for solving the „Jewish problem“. This is quite evident in the attitudes of the war criminals at the Nuremberg Trials. Many scientists and journalists most likely shared these feelings, although some did manage to maintain their own judgement.


An exception: the courageous anti-Nazi Wieland

Between 1933 and 1945 there was plenty of leeway on all levels of society, especially at universities. One witness,  Hildegard Hamm-Brücher,  Grand Old Lady of German politics, a truly democratic spirit,  herself half Jewish,  studied chemistry at Heinrich Wieland’s institute, a part of  the Munich University. In1945 she finished her doctoral thesis and received her PhD. The biochemist Wieland was already renowned as a Nobel Laureate. „He was a courageous anti-Nazi“, the 87 years old women recently told a crowd of students, „who protected students like myself who were always at risk“ and, if necessary, personally intervened on their behalf with the Nazi administration. His institute was a „center of excellency“ and an „oasis of decency in a brown desert“, Ms. Hamm-Brücher recalled. There was no spying, no denunciations, no Nazi jargon nor racial phrases, only hard work, at least ten hours a day. „Wieland was a lighthouse in the dark“, his former student concluded.[27],[28]


„Scientists are highly vulnerable to corruption“

Let’s finish with a short summary and an outlook. As the Max Planck Society (MPG), formerly the Imperial Research Institutions („Kaiser Wilhelm Gesellschaft“), concluded  in an investigation carried out by independent historians and published in 2005: No scientist were forced to do things against their will.[29] Whoever participated did so voluntarily. More than 50 percent of the biologists employed by the imperial institutions joined the Nazi party. By the way: The leading protagonist for eugenics was Konrad Lorenz, who in 1973 was honoured with the Nobel Prize – so much for  the memory, conscience and investigative competence of the international science community. The ethical responsibility of this body has become more important than ever in today’s globalized world .

Dr. Susanne Heim, who headed the historical commission summarized her Max Planck study in a single sentence: Scientists are highly vulnerable to intellectual and moral corruption – “Opportunities will be used if they promise more influence and success.“

If we want to do better than this, now and in the future, ethical guidelines will be  needed to reverse this apparently very common attitude!




The author wants to express his thanks to  P.J. Blumenthal who edited this text.


Wolfgang C. Goede *,

P.M. Magazin, editor, Weihenstephaner Str. 7, 81673 München, Germany


A German version of this article was published in P.M. History 01-2009:

A pdf version can be found on TELI’s homepage



[1]  Foerster, Hans Christian: „Am Anfang war die TELI Journalismus für Wissenschaft und Technik 1929 bis 1945“. Berlin 2007.

A large part of the research is documented on the history section of the TELI homepage

[2] Möbus, Willi: Politik gestaltet Technik. Kraft und Stoff / Weltverkehr. Techn. Beilage zur Deutschen Allg. Ztg. 19.04.1939

[3] Förster, Hans Christian: Von der Autonomie zur Mittäterschaft. Die fünf Schritte der Anpassung der TELI unterm Hakenkreuz. Präsentiert auf der TELI-Jahresversammlung Herbst 2007.

[4] Förster, Hans Christian: Neue Ergebnisse meiner Recherche im Berlin Document Center, unveröffentlichter Bericht, Frühjahr 2008

[5] Brams, Stefan: Ein Adler für die Bertelsfrau. Vernon Award-Verleihung löste Debatte über Bertelsmann NS-Vergangenheit aus. Neue Westfälische 10.06.2008

[6] Hage, Volker, Oels, David, Wiegrefe, Klaus: Hauptmann der Propaganda (Rowohlt-Verlag). Spiegel 22/2008

[7] Winkler, Willi: IM Deutschland. Stasi-Akten ruinieren heute Journalisten. Wer 1945 die Wende machte, konnte immer noch Meinungsführer werden. Süddeutsche Ztg., 12./13.04.2008

 [8] Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Wissenschaft. Planung. Vertreibung. Der Generalplan Ost der Nationalsozialisten. Eine Ausstellung der DFG 2006

 [9] Hoffmann, D. / Walker M.: Physiker zwischen Autonomie und Anpassung

Die deutsche physikalische Gesellschaft im Dritten Reich. Wiley-VCH Weinheim 2006


[10] Bartens, Werner: Die Perversion des Heilens, Süddeutsche Ztg., 25.10.2006


[11] Klee, Ernst: Wettlauf um „Menschenmaterial. Süddeutsche Ztg., 8.12.2006


[12] Alexander, Robin: Deutsches Braunes Kreuz? Die Welt, 25.06.2008


[13] Unit 731


[14] Koop, Eduard: Lothar Kreyssig. Chrismon 05.2008


[15] Augstein, Franziska: Immer den richtigen Riecher. Wie der unbeirrbare Friedrich Flick mit der NS-Führung kollaborierte. Süddeutsche Ztg. 14.07.2008


[16] Jungbluth, Rüdiger: Die Quandts und die Nazis, Die Zeit, 15.11.2007


[17] Kopper, Christopher: Göring stets zu Diensten. Diese Woche erscheint die große Studie zur Dresdner Bank im „Dritten Reich“. Die gesamte Führung applaudierte dem Geschäft mit der „Arisierung“. Die Zeit. 16.02.2006


[18] Wanderausstellung der Deutschen Bahn: Sonderzüge in den Tod. 2008


[19] Busch, Rainer: Sonderzüge in den Tod. Mobil 02/2008


[20] Kellerhoff, Felix Sven: 26. Mai 1938: Hitler tauft den VW, Welt am Sonntag, 25.05.2008


[21] Dalan, Marco: Gnade der zweiten Geburt. Vor 70 Jahren legte Hitler den Grundstein für das VW-Stammwerk. Die Welt, 24.05.2008


[22] Neufeld, Michael J: Von Braun. Dreamer of Space, Engineer of War. Knopf Publishers 2007.


[23] Rauchhaupt, Ulf von: Doktor Faustus, von Sputnik erlöst. Frankfurter Allg. Sonntagsztg., 30.09.2007


[24] P.M. Bog „Open Science“ 13.06.2007


[25] Bönisch, Georg, Leick, Romain, Wiegrefe, Klaus: Die Täter. Spiegel 11/2008


[26] Welzer, Harald: Täter. Wie aus ganz normalen Menschen Massenmörder werden. Fischer Verlag


[27] Hamm-Brücher, Hildegard: Freiheit ist mehr als ein Wort. dtv 1997 (1). Erinnern für die 2001 (2)


[28] Wieland, Sibylle et al: Heinrich Wieland. Naturforscher, Nobelpreisträger und Willstätter Uhr, Wiley-VCH,  Weinheim 2007


[29] Max-Planck-Gesellschaft: History of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society in the National Socialist Era, Berlin 2004



Further literature:


Bastian, Till: High Tech unterm Hakenkreuz. Von Atombombe bis Weltraumfahrt, Militzke 2005


Bonstein, Julia, Hawranek, Dietmar, Wiegrefe, Klaus: Ende des Schweigens. Spiegel 41/2007


Buchheim, Christoph: Versuch einer Synthese. Historische Zeitschrift (2006);


Büschemann, Karl-Heinz: Eine schwierige Vergangenheit, Süddeutsche Ztg. (SZ) 20.12.2007


Rolf Degen: Wir Grausamen, Weltwoche Nr. 37.2008


Eckart, Wolfgang U et al (Hg): Die Universität Heidelberg im Nationalsozialismus. Heidelberg 2006


Endele, Kerstin: Die Rolle der Charité im Dritten Reich, in: Informationsdienst Wissenschaft idw, 20.10.2006


Förster, Hans Christian: Von der Autonomie zur Mittäterschaft. Ein Beitrag zum Thema „Ethik im Wissenschaftsjournalismus“ für den EUSJA Kongress in Barcelona 2008. Script vom 27.05.2008


Frankfurter Allg. Sonntagszeitung (FAS): Sie dienen allen Herren. Unternehmen arrangieren sich auch mit Diktaturen. Das ist die Lehre aus der NS-Zeit. Nr.11, 27.05.2008


Goede, Wolfgang C.:  The Twenties – Exciting Times in Germany. EUSJA anniversary book. 2006,


Hachmeister, Lutz / Kloft, Michael: Das Goebbels-Experiment. DVA-Spiegel-Verlag 2005,1518,342422,00.html


Hermann, Armin: Ein Autodidakt mit sechshundert Patenten. Manfred von Ardenne diente den Mächtigen seiner Zeit und wurde von ihnen hofiert. Berliner Ztg. 20./21.01.2007


Hossfeld, Uwe & Lennart Olsson: Nature and Hitler, in: Nature.


Jaekel, Walter: Der Führer fördert die Technik. Kraft und Stoff / Weltverkehr. Techn. Beilage zur Deutschen Allg. Ztg. 19.04.1939


Kellerhoff, Sven Felix: Erzwungene Ehrlichkeit, Welt am Sonntag, 18.11.2007


Kraus, Elisabeth: Die Universität München im Dritten Reich. München 2006


Kunert, Matthias: Eine unbequeme Vergangenheit. Deutsche Forscher stützten das Nazi-Regime. Berliner Ztg., 31.01.2008


Laudien, Stephan: Über Wege und Irrwege der Wissenschaft im Nationalsoziallismus, in: Informationsdienst Wissenschaft, idw, 5.02.2008


Makkink, Henk: Ethics for Engineers. Delft Outlook, 4-2007


Neitzert, Marcus: Die DPG im Nationalsozialismus, in: Informationsdienst Wissenschaft idw, 5.12.2006


Rügemer, H.: Die „Nature“ ist eine Greuelzeitschrift, in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Naturwissenschaft, Heft 12, 1938


Saur, Karl-Otto & Michael: Er stand in Hitlers Testament. Econ


Schwarz, Michael: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft arbeitet ihre Geschichte im Nationalsozialismus auf, in: Informationsdienst Wissenschaft idw, 5.02.2008


Seifert, Michael: Neuer Bericht des Arbeitskreises „Universität Tübingen im Nationalsozialismus“, Forschungsergebnisse zu Zwangssterilisation an den Universitätskliniken Tübingen, in:  Informationsdienst Wissenschaft idw, 14.07.2008


Sonntag, Christian: Ganz auf einer Linie. Die meisten Journalisten ließen sich 1933 ohne Widerstand gleichschalten. Berliner Ztg., 28.05.2008


Thurau, Martin: Hochschule unterm Hakenkreuz. Süddeutsche Ztg., 27.09.2006


Viciano, Astrid: Die approbierten Mörder. Die Zeit, 12.10.2006


Wette, Wolfram: Zivilcourage in Uniform. Die Zeit, 9.11.2006


Widmann, Carlos: Der Mann, der reiche Onkels brauchte. Ob John F. Kennedy, Walt Disney oder Adolf Hitler: Der Raketenbauer Wernher von Braun bot seine Arbeit jedem an – solange er damit den Sternen näher kam. Süddeutsche Ztg., 1./2.03.2008


Wiegrefe, Klaus: Schöne Tage in Auschwitz. Spiegel 39/2007


Zekri, Sonja: Treblinka an 6.28 Uhr. In Nürnberg stellt sich die Bahn der NS-Zeit. Süddeutsche Ztg. 26.01.2007


Zimbardo, Philip G.: The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. Random House 2007